Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-17849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) was surveyed in the residential biotopes of Sindhudurg, Ratnagiri and Raigadh districts, Maharashtra State during dry (January-May & November- December) and wet (June-October) months in 2002 to update information on its distribution, to analyse post invasion establishment, and to study its prevalence. METHODS: The survey was designed to unfold Ae. aegypti distributions at landscape, habitat and micro-habitat levels. Risks of distribution and establishment due to differences amongst settlements, households and habitat attributes were analysed by univariate and multivariate methods. Demographic/transport changes were surveyed for its breeding refugia during dry months and prevalence during the wet seasons. Chi square tests for difference and relative risks of container types were applied to assess container habitats preferences for Ae. aegypti breeding, thus contributing to the risk of establishment and prevalence through seasons. RESULTS: Ae. aegypti was present in 16 out of total 28 settlements in dry season and 22 of 25 in wet season; the Breteau index (BI) varied from 1.25 to 57.33 and the container index (CI) was 0.6 to 25.81 in the dry season and BI from 1.25 to 110-00 and CI - 0.2 to 11.37 in the wet season, respectively. At macro-level, rural settlements and ports showed higher odds ratios (OR>1) for presence of Ae. aegypti. At meso-level, OR were 65.8, 24.8 and 4.9 for Ae. aegypti breeding in compact houses, clustered housing and in houses with tap water source respectively. At micro-level the plastic drums and small plastic containers were the important key habitats of its breeding. In the non-residential areas Ae. aegypti breeding was noted in one port during dry season; 10-road transport tyre dumps and scrap, 5 of 7 seaports and none of the two railway station areas during wet season. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: At macro-geographic level Ae. aegypti distribution increased in 3 settlements, new establishment was seen in 7, new records in ten settlements and two were negative in past and present surveys. Logistic regression analyses indicated that the distribution was found to be more associated with ports and rural areas. At meso-geographic level the house aggregations and household drinking water supplies were of risk even at lower urbanization and rural levels. At micro-level, the site and potability were confounders; outdoor non potable water storage containers posed significant breeding risk, the potable water storage was significant but it contributed little to Ae. aegypti breeding. Further, Ae. aegypti breeding showed high preference to the plastic drums and other plastic miscellany. The results signified an expansion in the risk area of diseases borne by it in the context of urbanization, transport development and changing habitats.


Subject(s)
Aedes/pathogenicity , Animals , Breeding , Dengue/prevention & control , Dengue Virus/isolation & purification , Ecosystem , Female , Housing , Humans , India , Insect Vectors/pathogenicity , Male , Seasons
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-23501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Dengue virus activity has never been reported in the state of Goa. The present study was carried out to document a multilevel geographic distribution, prevalence and preliminary analysis of risk factors for the invasions of Aedes aegypti in Goa. METHODS: A geographic information system (GIS) based Ae. aegypti surveys were conducted in dry (April 2002) and wet (July 2002) seasons in the rural and urban settlements. The random walk method was used for household coverage. The non-residential area visits included ancillaries of roadways, railways, air-and seaports. Simultaneous adult mosquito collections and one-larva per container technique were adopted. RESULTS: The Ae. aegypti larval and adult prevalence was noted in all the four urban areas in both dry (Density index (DI)= 3 to 6) and wet (DI= 5 to 7) seasons and only one out of 3 villages showed Ae aegypti presence in wet season (DI= 5 to 7). In the residential areas, hutments showed higher relative prevalence indices (Breteau index, BI=100; container index, CI=11.95; adult house index, AHI=13.33) followed by close set cement houses (BI=44.1; CI=12.0; AHI=11.24). Ae aegypti relative prevalence indices were also more for households with pets (BI=85.11; CI=12.5; AHI= 42.85); those with tap had higher risk (larval house index, LHI =32.03; relative risk, RR>2, n=256). Plastic drum was the most preferred breeding place (chi(2) = 19.81; P<0.01; RR=3.41) among domestic containers and rubber tyres (chi(2) = 11.86; P<0.01; RR=3.61)among sundry/rainfilled containers. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Established Ae aegypti prevalence in the urban settlements during dry and wet seasons and its scattered distribution in a rural settlement spell risk of dengue infection at macro-level. In the residential areas nature and types of the households, tap water supply and storage and communities' attitude and practices contribute to sustained meso-level risk of Ae aegypti prevalence dependant DEN. The non-residential areas offer transient meso-level risk as Ae aegypti prevalence was seasonally unstable and monsoon dependent. Risk at micro-level was due to the preferred larval habitats of Ae aegypti breeding viz., residential plastic-ware and tyres, and transport tyres in non-residential areas.


Subject(s)
Aedes/physiology , Animals , Demography , Dengue/epidemiology , Geographic Information Systems , India/epidemiology , Population Density , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Specimen Handling
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL